(PAGE 2 OF 3)
What’s
going on here? What kind of unresolved adolescent anger are New York
parents trying to express by plastering images of angry rockers and
political revolutionaries on their tots? Could it maybe be anger at the
pressure to acquire a baby, now, as if it were the latest Marc Jacobs handbag—cramming it into your closet of an unaffordable one-bedroom?
“Children
were always dressed in a way that would allow parents to convey to
other people what their identity was,” said Tory Higgins, a professor
of the psychology of business at Columbia University. But registering
for a ribbon-trimmed layette at the late, lamented Peck & Peck, as
one might have done in the 1950’s, is one thing; forcing one’s tots
into what looks like the miniaturized garb of disaffected collegians is
quite another.
‘My Parents Think I’m a Badass’
Down
on the Lower East Side, Stephanie Dolgoff likes to dress her twin
2-year-old daughters in T-shirts bearing flippant slogans like
“President Poopyhead” and “Bush Is a Tush.” During the family’s regular
perambulations around their neighborhood, the incongruous sight of the
tots in their special shirts often inspires hearty guffaws or approving
nods from the few remaining political radicals that live there. “I
don’t want to make them out to be like walking posters,” said Ms.
Dolgoff, 38, the health director at Self magazine, defending
the fashion choices she makes on her kids’ behalf. “Really, it’s just
funny. The old folks in the neighborhood think it’s funny. They agree
Bush is a shithead … and I tell them not to curse in front of my
children.”
These shirts are produced by
Baby Wit, a Portland, Ore.–based online company run by a woman named
Andrea Frost (slogan: “You may not be cool, but your baby can be.”)
They are two of her hottest sellers—particularly among the large
population of liberal parents in New York City.
Like
Ms. Manwarring, Ms. Frost started Baby Wit two years ago when her
daughter, Ava, was 4 years old. In a phone interview, Ms. Frost
admitted that she doesn’t really want her daughter to idolize
the Sex Pistols. “I certainly wouldn’t take my child to a show; she
would have to be a lot older to go to something like that,” she said.
“But the Sex Pistol shirt on a baby means something different than it
does on an 18-year old kid. On a baby it says, ‘My parents think I’m a
badass.’”
Stores selling this kind of
merchandise are multiplying at an alarming rate in New York City. The
Slope is home to the flippant children’s boutique Babybird, while the
Village has two locations, East and West, of a place called Lucky Wang,
carrying shirts imprinted with the words “L’il Goddess” and images of
the Buddha. The East Village is a veritable hotbed of similar shops,
including Exit 9, while the Lower East Side is home to Funky Fresh.
Manhattan
parents defend their patronage of such establishments, saying that
putting their kids in “edgy” clothes is preferable to engulfing them in
the blander, more conventional messages of mass-market society. “It’s
no better or worse than wearing an Old Navy shirt,” said Ms. Dolgoff,
the Self staffer. “If you put a corporate logo on your kid—which many people do—it’s advertising a belief.”
And,
of course, some parents aren’t actively shopping for the shirts, but
rather receive them as well-meaning gifts from that New York staple:
childless hipsters. Arthur Schellenberg, a 32-year-old bachelor living
on Sutton Place, recently bought a Sonic Youth T-shirt for his
14-month-old nephew, adding to a collection that includes “President
Poopyhead” and “I Already Know …. ” The gesture was meant as a slight
dig at his sister, who lives a comfortable suburban life with her
husband in Westfield, N.J. “It’s just a little something saying, ‘Your
kids will probably end up being cooler than you are,’” Mr. Schellenberg
said.
CONTINUED
PREVIOUS 1
2
3